
Herridge case shows the need to pass the PRESS Act
Journalists and sources face confusion and unpredictability without a federal shield law. The public suffers as a result
Journalists and sources face confusion and unpredictability without a federal shield law. The public suffers as a result
Even “catch and release” arrests threaten press freedom
On Tuesday, the High Court in London granted WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange another hearing on his extradition to the United States, averting — at least temporarily — a press freedom catastrophe. While we’re glad that Assange isn’t being immediately extradited, the threat to journalists from the Espionage Act charges against him remains.
To protect the public’s right to know, the court should find that the press has a First Amendment right to cover police activity in public places
Discussion highlights implications of Assange prosecution for journalism in US and globally
Barring the platform would set a precedent for all sorts of future censorship, including bans on foreign news sites
President Biden has said that journalism isn’t a crime. But the DOJ seems to think otherwise
Quote on press freedom impact of today's Assange decision
Most analyses of Monday’s Supreme Court argument in Murthy v. Missouri, the case about government pressure on social media content moderation, agree that the justices are likely to rule that the government can influence platforms’ moderation decisions. But when it comes to alleged threats to “national security,” some justices seemed willing to let the government go even further by coercing — or even requiring — takedowns.
During a week celebrating government openness, three states — New Jersey, Colorado, and California — considered or enacted anti-transparency laws