States must step up to protect journalist-source confidentiality

AP Photo/Bebeto Matthews
Confidential sources need to know that journalists won’t be forced to out them.
Many sources with newsworthy information can only speak out safely if their names are kept confidential. Journalists need to be able to promise sources confidentiality — and be able to keep those promises without going to jail.
Almost every state has recognized a reporter-source privilege that protects confidential sources and, in some cases, other newsgathering materials. But those laws don’t always stop demands for reporters’ sources, and bad legal decisions can undermine them. We need to strengthen the reporter-source privilege at both the state and federal levels.
If officials say newsgathering is illegal, subpoenaed journalists should take them at their word
Speaking the truth shouldn’t subject you to drummed-up lawsuits, endless legal proceedings, and potentially bankrupting legal fees, journalist Charles Ornstein told us
With no federal anti-SLAPP law, journalists and others remain vulnerable to frivolous lawsuits that chill First Amendment rights
Floyd Abrams, Marion County Record, 121 others endorse federal shield bill
Texas citizen journalist’s case is an opportunity to push back against criminalization of routine newsgathering
Senate must advance legislation to protect journalists and their sources from subpoenas and surveillance
Iowa senator can further his legacy of supporting whistleblowers and First Amendment freedoms
It takes courage for politicians likely to be criticized by journalists to nonetheless stand up for their constitutional rights
The bill to protect journalist-source confidentiality that passed the House last week is the most important press freedom bill in modern times
The federal reporter’s shield bill is one step closer to becoming law. It’s time for the Senate to do its part to protect press freedom and pass the PRESS Act.