States must step up to protect journalist-source confidentiality

AP Photo/Bebeto Matthews
Confidential sources need to know that journalists won’t be forced to out them.
Many sources with newsworthy information can only speak out safely if their names are kept confidential. Journalists need to be able to promise sources confidentiality — and be able to keep those promises without going to jail.
Almost every state has recognized a reporter-source privilege that protects confidential sources and, in some cases, other newsgathering materials. But those laws don’t always stop demands for reporters’ sources, and bad legal decisions can undermine them. We need to strengthen the reporter-source privilege at both the state and federal levels.
Iowa senator can further his legacy of supporting whistleblowers and First Amendment freedoms
It takes courage for politicians likely to be criticized by journalists to nonetheless stand up for their constitutional rights
The bill to protect journalist-source confidentiality that passed the House last week is the most important press freedom bill in modern times
The federal reporter’s shield bill is one step closer to becoming law. It’s time for the Senate to do its part to protect press freedom and pass the PRESS Act.
Marion County Record publisher Eric Meyer and digital journalist Tim Burke discuss their cases and the state of the free press
Reporters shouldn’t have to face fines or jail time in order to appeal orders requiring them to name confidential sources
NewsGuild should be working to expand the reporter’s privilege, not demanding journalists out sources in court
The Nevada Supreme Court should bar the search of murdered reporter’s devices
The federal shield law bill would protect journalists, confidential sources, and the American people’s right to know
A federal judge implied that the lack of a federal shield law weakens the reporter’s privilege