States must step up to protect journalist-source confidentiality


AP Photo/Bebeto Matthews
Confidential sources need to know that journalists won’t be forced to out them.
Many sources with newsworthy information can only speak out safely if their names are kept confidential. Journalists need to be able to promise sources confidentiality — and be able to keep those promises without going to jail.
Almost every state has recognized a reporter-source privilege that protects confidential sources and, in some cases, other newsgathering materials. But those laws don’t always stop demands for reporters’ sources, and bad legal decisions can undermine them. We need to strengthen the reporter-source privilege at both the state and federal levels.
A House committee voted to subpoena journalist Seth Harp over his constitutionally protected reporting of the name of a commander involved in the Nicolás Maduro abduction, and a GOP representative asked the Justice Department to prosecute Harp under the Espionage Act. Tell Congress to cut it out and stand up for the First Amendment.

Under fire for the unprecedented Justice Department leak investigation that has engulfed the Associated Press, the White House yesterday asked the Senate to revive the stalled federal shield bill, which would aim to protect reporters from being forced to reveal their sources in many situations. A robust federal shield …
Something went wrong and your email updates subscription could not be processed. Please visit our signup page and try again.
Thank you for telling Congress to end its unconstitutional efforts to investigate journalist Seth Harp.
Share this message on social media: