Reform Government Secrecy

AI-generated image

The U.S. classifies far too many secrets, obstructing democracy.

Excessive government secrecy takes many forms, from agencies needlessly claiming documents are classified to ignoring information requests and destroying records — even when the documents show government fraud or illegal conduct. This hinders a free press, effective oversight, and the public’s ability to self govern.

We need to fight for systemic improvements, and we need the press to vigorously question the government every time it says something is classified.

Write a letter telling Congress to read DOJ memo into public record

The public deserves to scrutinize the legal rationale behind the deadly attacks on alleged drug boats, but the administration is keeping the Department of Justice memo secret. Congress can change that — but it needs to hear from you to act.

First Name * Last Name
Email Address *
Street Address * Zip Code * Enter a five digit US ZIP code

Edit this message so that it is unique to you: Dear Senator/Representative, As your constituent, I am deeply troubled by the lethal targeting of alleged drug boats, including strikes on defenseless survivors. This concern is exacerbated by the fact that the Trump administration has kept the legal rationale for these deadly attacks secret. You have the power to force transparency. I am asking that you PLEASE READ the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel memo justifying these strikes INTO THE CONGRESSIONAL RECORD. By following in the historic footsteps of Sen. Mike Gravel, who read the Pentagon Papers into the Congressional Record in 1971, you would help the public scrutinize the legality and necessity of the strikes. There’s no excuse not to. Members of Congress enjoy broad immunity to expose government lies, thanks to the speech or debate clause of the Constitution. And the document’s classified status shouldn’t be a barrier, as records that are properly classified can still be declassified if their release is in the public interest. The legal rationale for killing nearly a hundred people without due process meets that definition. The public deserves to know how the government is sanctioning these strikes. Now is the time for you to read the memo into the public record. Thank you. URLs are not allowed in this message.

* Required. We will not share your information with third parties. Learn more

Something went wrong processing this request. Please try again later.

Opt in to email updates from Freedom of the Press Foundation

Something went wrong and your email updates subscription could not be processed. Please visit our signup page and try again.

Thank you for asking Congress to read the boat strike memo into the Congressional Record.

Donate

Share this message on social media: The public deserves to scrutinize the legal rationale behind the deadly attacks on alleged drug boats, but the administration is keeping the memo secret.
Congress can change that today.
Use our action center tool to tell Congress to read the memo into the Congressional Record.
Join me in asking Congress to read the boat strike memo into the Congressional Record.

Featured Items

Fifty years ago today, Senator Mike Gravel read the Pentagon Papers into the official record. More lawmakers should follow his lead.
Leaks•Article
While the New York Times and the Washington Post were tied up in the Supreme Court over whether they could report on the leaked Pentagon Papers, Senator Mike Gravel took matters into his own hands.

June 29, 2021 Parker Higgins
Offsetting the carbon costs from the Snowden NFT charity auction
Whistleblowers•Article
Freedom of the Press Foundation has dedicated a portion of the proceeds from the auction of “Stay Free,” Edward Snowden’s record-breaking NFT artwork, to purchasing carbon offsets to address the emissions associated with the sale. We requested an estimate of the NFT’s output from the decarbonization platform Aerial, and opted for the very top of the estimated range.

May 17, 2021 Parker Higgins
Supreme Court goes live in the age of COVID, and rules on press freedom issues
Court access•Article
The Supreme Court will take the unprecedented step of broadcasting its oral arguments for two weeks beginning today, enacting in response to the coronavirus pandemic a measure that government transparency advocates have demanded for years.

May 4, 2020 Parker Higgins
How’s newsgathering during COVID-19 at the state level? Depends on the governor.
Court access•Article
Journalists covering state responses to the coronavirus pandemic are hampered as officials reduce seating in briefing rooms, introduce unreliable technology and, in some cases, refuse real-time questions.

May 1, 2020 Stephanie Sugars
Government transparency cannot be a coronavirus casualty
FOIA•Article
Government agencies from the local to federal level are failing to live up to their legal transparency obligations even as the stakes for access to relevant information are at an all-time high.

April 2, 2020 Parker Higgins
How do newsrooms get their news tips? We reviewed over 80 news outlets
Whistleblowers•Article
We looked at over 80 news sites to measure how different newsrooms can get sensitive tips from sources.

Feb. 6, 2020 Parker Higgins
New ruling gives legal boost to a key data journalism tool
Court access•Article
A recent federal appeals court ruling may be a big win for data journalists and researchers who depend on scraping to collect information to report on.

Sept. 20, 2019 Parker Higgins
Tell Rep. Adam Schiff to remove this dangerous secrecy provision from this year’s intelligence bill
Secrecy•Article
Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff inserted a provision in the House's intel bill that threatens press freedom.

July 11, 2019
California’s new transparency law increases police visibility and amplifies reporting, but the state is still resisting it
FOIA•Article
Recent courtroom wins in California have led to the release of new police shooting records under a new transparency law, but some government agencies have been resisting compliance.

May 14, 2019 Camille Fassett
California AG refuses to rule out legal action against public records journalists, in new statements
Arrests/Prosecutions•Article
'It's either the case that the Attorney General of California is ... suggesting he can [prosecute] just to intimidate those journalists—or that he doesn't know what California law says. I don't find either option very comforting.'

March 5, 2019 Parker Higgins Camille Fassett