Lawsuit seeks transparency on Assange prosecution

AP Photo/Pascal Bastien
His prosecution is over, but the implications for journalists are alarming.
After pleading guilty to charges brought by the U.S. Department of Justice, Assange is the first person to be convicted under the Espionage Act for speaking with a source, receiving classified documents, and publishing them. In other words, things that journalists at news outlets do every day.
This is why Freedom of the Press Foundation (FPF) led a coalition of virtually every major civil liberties and human rights organization in the country to denounce the unprecedented case as a clear and present danger to press freedom.
The Supreme Court seems to understand the First Amendment limits on government coercion of speech — except when it comes to national security
The DOJ must end the Assange case before it turns journalists into criminals
A new FPF video explains exactly how the Espionage Act charges against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange endanger journalists and news outlets
Letter from legal scholars explains how prosecuting Julian Assange threatens press freedom
Student journalists set an example for the professionals when it comes to standing up for the First Amendment
It’s troubling that our government apparently views disclosing its secrets as an exponentially more serious offense than possessing troves of child pornography
Whether Julian Assange is a journalist is irrelevant to the threat his prosecution poses to press freedom
Our government should have heeded calls to drop charges against Assange long ago. It’s embarrassing that foreigners have to remind us of our constitutional principles
Amendment would stop unconstitutional charges against journalists and whistleblowers without impacting real espionage cases
Assange's prosecution should be condemned by all who believe in press freedom