Not publishing newsworthy leaks isn’t journalistic integrity, it’s timidity


AP Photo/Jon Elswick
Reporting on leaked information informs the public, while claims of harm are often overblown.
Journalists routinely rely on leaked information to inform the public. Without leaks, we’d be left in the dark about vital information involving the government, corporations, and powerful individuals, who often act in secret.
When government information is leaked, the U.S. routinely claims, without proof, that the leak damages national security. We should be skeptical of claims that leaks cause harm, and of broad leak investigations that can lead to the surveillance of journalists and sources and the chilling of reporting.

Clayton may be the next DNI. But his willingness to disregard press freedom rules to appease the president makes him unfit to serve in the role

Dear Friend of Press Freedom:One of the most important press freedom cases in the country deserves far more attention: Journalist Catherine Herridge has paid at least $4,000 in fines for refusing to reveal a confidential source, and she’ll owe even more unless the Supreme Court steps in. Plus: a …

After the Times reported on Trump’s Qatari-gifted Air Force One replacement, his administration looked for any excuse to snoop on the reporters and their relatives

Plus: NYT subpoenaed for reporting on Trump’s bribe plane

The Trump administration’s efforts to suppress reporting show exactly why we need to protect journalists

Israel threatens NYT over torture report

The government’s investigation of The Wall Street Journal is an outrageous attempt to silence sources and intimidate journalists

FBI investigates yet another news story critical of Kash Patel

The investigation would be outrageous even if the magazine reported classified information, which it didn’t

Plus: DOJ wants to scrap the Presidential Records Act