Not publishing newsworthy leaks isn’t journalistic integrity, it’s timidity
AP Photo/Jon Elswick
Reporting on leaked information informs the public, while claims of harm are often overblown.
Journalists routinely rely on leaked information to inform the public. Without leaks, we’d be left in the dark about vital information involving the government, corporations, and powerful individuals, who often act in secret.
When government information is leaked, the U.S. routinely claims, without proof, that the leak damages national security. We should be skeptical of claims that leaks cause harm, and of broad leak investigations that can lead to the surveillance of journalists and sources and the chilling of reporting.
Öztürk deportation case among America’s most blatant press freedom violations
Recent leaks have exposed DHS’s warrantless home invasions, targeting of protesters, surveillance overreach, and propaganda campaigns
Reporters can’t be limited to information that falls into their laps. They’re entitled to report
Plus: Texas is about to ban college kids talking at night
In FPF webinar, journalists discuss past administrations’ surveillance of their source communications and what Trump may do next
Policy purports to grant county board chair a monopoly on facts
A new letter from Sen. Ron Wyden reveals which wireless carriers inform customers about government surveillance requests
Plus: Don’t empower Trump to define terrorism
Virtually every time the government has cracked down on leaks claiming some kind of threat to the homeland, the real threat has been to its own reputation.
Trump’s film tariff announcement reveals more misuse of national security rhetoric.