Mississippi judge ignores constitution to order takedown of editorial
Featured Items
-
Tech companies platform the First Amendment
Substack and Amazon Web Services’ First Amendment defense of journalist Jack Poulson should be a model for other platforms
-
X goes ‘thermonuclear’ against media donors
Social platform’s unconstitutional demand for Media Matters’ donor information imperils nonprofit news, argues legal brief by FPF
-
Bipartisan bill would protect speech from harassing lawsuits
The Free Speech Protection Act could fix a gap in federal law that leaves journalists and others vulnerable to SLAPPs — frivolous lawsuits targeting speech.
-
San Francisco should not be part of tech exec’s censorship campaign
In the end, the campaign to censor a journalist has brought far more attention to Maury Blackman’s domestic violence arrest
-
Now or never for PRESS Act
Congress has two months to pass the most important press freedom legislation in modern history.
-
Censoring news does not protect consumers
Trump’s frivolous ‘60 Minutes’ lawsuit furthers a campaign to use consumer protection laws against free speech and press rights.
-
Government refuses to learn its lesson on censorship
Recent news from LA and Tennessee shows latest examples of public officials’ cluelessness when it comes to journalists’ constitutional rights
-
Federal law must fix loophole allowing abusive lawsuits targeting speech
With no federal anti-SLAPP law, journalists and others remain vulnerable to frivolous lawsuits that chill First Amendment rights
-
Media Matters layoffs underscore need to crack down on SLAPPs
Billionaires and politicians don't need to actually win their lawsuits to hurt already struggling media outlets
-
New Jersey anti-SLAPP law faces its first test
Here’s what journalists should watch for in the first case applying the state’s new law meant to protect against meritless anti-speech lawsuits
