The case for ignoring censorship orders


AP Photo/Jim Wells
Bars on publication, also known as prior restraints, are a serious violation of free speech.
The First Amendment forbids nearly all orders barring the press from publishing information, also known as prior restraints. But that doesn’t stop the government from trying.
For nearly 100 years, the Supreme Court has consistently rejected prior restraints on the press, including in its famous decision in the Pentagon Papers case. But lower courts and government officials continue to violate the Constitution by trying to gag the press from publishing, withholding vital information from the public. Prior restraints are antithetical to press freedom and must be stopped.

New policy fails to comply with court order, constitution

Unrestrained reporting is especially crucial now that we’re at war

Seizures of journalists’ materials have the same impact as traditional prior restraints

No, Florida should not have its own CIA

Journalists have the right to critically report on the government without signing away their integrity

Plus: How noncitizen journalists can prepare for ICE

Reporters can’t be limited to information that falls into their laps. They’re entitled to report

Wholesale Pentagon secrecy is a new low for an already secretive government

Attempted restraining order yet another instance of local officials punishing routine journalism

Plus: Disbar anti-press prosecutor