Assange case threatens journalism

    Next week, the High Court in London will consider whether Julian Assange should be extradited to the United States to face charges under the Espionage Act for obtaining government secrets from a source and publishing them. Even if you don’t like Assange, or don’t think he’s a journalist, his case poses an existential threat to the First Amendment rights of the journalists you do like.

    Law professors to DOJ: Drop Assange prosecution

    Letter from legal scholars explains how prosecuting Julian Assange threatens press freedom

  • Tell the Biden administration to drop the Assange case now

  • Publishing government secrets shouldn’t be illegal

    The DOJ must end the Assange case before it turns journalists into criminals

    Harsh punishments for leakers hurt journalism

    Former IRS contractor Charles Littlejohn received the maximum sentence of five years’ imprisonment on Monday, after pleading guilty to leaking Donald Trump’s returns to The New York Times. Littlejohn also leaked a tranche of ultrawealthy Americans’ tax documents to ProPublica. It’s sadly ironic that Littlejohn is being harshly punished for exposing billionaire tax evasion while billionaire tax evaders themselves continue to be afforded leniency by the judiciary.

    Bipartisan support for the PRESS Act

    As unlikely as it sounds, Republicans and Democrats are putting their differences aside to support the most important press freedom legislation in modern times — the PRESS Act.

    Ex-CIA employee deserves a long prison sentence — but not for leaking documents

    It’s troubling that our government apparently views disclosing its secrets as an exponentially more serious offense than possessing troves of child pornography

    Northwestern’s student newspaper helps kill anti-speech prosecution

    Student journalists set an example for the professionals when it comes to standing up for the First Amendment

    The case for ignoring censorship orders

    Our U.S. Press Freedom Tracker documented 11 prior restraints against journalists in 2023, the most since it started tracking them in 2017. The Supreme Court has called prior restraints — or government orders not to publish information — the “most serious” First Amendment violation. They are almost never constitutional. And yet, courts keep entering prior restraints with little regard for the law, leaving journalists censored while often slow-moving appellate processes play out.

    Government must explain newsroom raid

    It’s been more than seven months since the May 2023 FBI raid of Florida journalist Tim Burke’s home newsroom, after Burke found and publicized Fox News interview outtakes where rapper Ye made antisemitic remarks. Yet the government still hasn’t explained the basis for the raid or returned all of Burke’s seized equipment and information.