Reform Government Secrecy

- The Latest
  Regular reporting on government secrecy, surveillance, and the rights of reporters and whistleblowers.
  - The Classifieds
  - News Releases
- Technology
  Working open source software products to protect journalists, newsrooms, and their sources.
  - SecureDrop
  - Dangerzone
- U.S. Press Freedom Tracker
  A database of press freedom incidents in the United States.
  - Data Visualizations
  - Explore the Database
- Digital Security Education
  Digital security trainings and resources for journalists.
  - Request a Training
  - Guides & Resources
- About Us
  Protecting and defending press freedom when we need it the most.
- Our Team
  - Staff & Contributors
  - Board of Directors
- Transparency
  - Reports & Financials
  - Announcements
- Get in Touch
  - Jobs & Internships
  - Contact Us
Take action
Donate

A pile of classified redacted documents

AI-generated image

The U.S. classifies far too many secrets, obstructing democracy.

Excessive government secrecy takes many forms, from agencies needlessly claiming documents are classified to ignoring information requests and destroying records — even when the documents show government fraud or illegal conduct. This hinders a free press, effective oversight, and the public’s ability to self govern.

We need to fight for systemic improvements, and we need the press to vigorously question the government every time it says something is classified.

Tell Congress to support the Presidential Records Act

First Name * Last Name
Email Address *
Street Address * Zip Code * Enter a five digit US ZIP code

Edit this message so that it is unique to you: Dear [Senator/Representative], As your constituent, I am writing to urge you to ISSUE A STATEMENT explicitly reaffirming that the Presidential Records Act is constitutional and that any claims to the contrary are not lawful and threaten our democracy. This is necessary in response to the Department of Justice’s recent memo claiming the PRA is unconstitutional, arguing that a president’s records are private property. This is wrong and flips 50 years of transparency on its head. The law has required every president since Ronald Reagan to turn their records over to the government at the end of their term. This ensures that the “American story” belongs to the public, not just those who inhabit the White House. This transparency provided vital insights into Democratic and Republican administrations alike, on topics ranging from the Obama administration’s Iran nuclear deal and the George W. Bush administration’s response to Hurricane Katrina. If this DOJ memo stands, every future president, Democrat or Republican, will operate in total darkness. This is a bipartisan emergency. I am asking you to PLEASE SPEAK OUT and use your influence to safeguard the PRA. Your efforts to ensure our government remains transparent will have major implications for the public’s faith in our democracy. Thank you. URLs are not allowed in this message.

* Required. We will not share your information with third parties. Learn more

Something went wrong processing this request. Please try again later.

Opt in to email updates from Freedom of the Press Foundation

Something went wrong and your email updates subscription could not be processed. Please visit our signup page and try again.

Thank you for urging lawmakers to stand against dangerous secrecy.

Donate

Share this message on social media:
Join me in urging Congress to defend the Presidential Records Act, thus ensuring that the American story belongs to the public — not whoever is in the White House.

Featured Items

Congress took the lead on JFK declassification. That should happen more often
Secrecy•Article
It’s the anniversary of JFK’s assassination, and the law that released millions of pages of assassination records is over 30 years old. It's time for Congress to resume high-level declassification reviews

Published Nov. 22, 2024 Lauren Harper
The government abuses spying powers no matter who the president is
Secrecy•Article
An effort by social platform X to weaken the government’s ability to spy on citizens and hide the fact it does so should have broad bipartisan support

Published Nov. 18, 2024 Lauren Harper
Trump’s reelection puts us in uncharted territory over secrecy. Now what?
Secrecy•Article
Steps President Biden, press, public, and members of Congress must take to fight secrecy abuses to come

Published Nov. 6, 2024 Lauren Harper
Four more years … of government secrecy?
Secrecy•Newsletter
How secretive would a second Trump or a Harris administration be? And how much could either presidential candidate rein in the government’s sprawling secrecy system if they wanted to?

Published Nov. 1, 2024 Freedom of the Press Foundation
Is entrenched secrecy more powerful than the presidency?
Secrecy•Article
Secrecy isn’t a partisan issue, it’s a systemic one. What are the key government secrecy issues that must be addressed regardless of who wins the election?

Published Oct. 30, 2024 Lauren Harper
The Harris secrecy assessment
Secrecy•Article
How secretive would a Harris administration be? Her time in the Senate provides insights on ways she could shape secrecy in the United States as president.

Published Oct. 30, 2024 Lauren Harper
The Trump secrecy assessment
Secrecy•Article
The first Trump administration flouted transparency norms, preservation laws, and attempts at congressional oversight. How might a second Trump term continue this trend?

Published Oct. 30, 2024 Lauren Harper
Excessive government secrecy and the presidential election
Secrecy•Article
This multipart series assesses the secrecy risks of both presidential candidates, the systemic problems that will challenge either presidential administration, and the ways the public can most effectively fight for transparency.

Published Oct. 30, 2024 Lauren Harper
Heritage Foundation sends lots of FOIAs. That shouldn’t be a problem
Secrecy•Article
A records request can be legitimate even if its goal is unpopular

Published Oct. 8, 2024 Lauren Harper
Time for Biden to declassify Khashoggi intelligence
Secrecy•Article
Reports on the journalist’s murder are still secret. Their release would place democratic principles over a relationship with an authoritarian ruler

Published Oct. 4, 2024 Freedom of the Press Foundation