Not publishing newsworthy leaks isn’t journalistic integrity, it’s timidity

AP Photo/Jon Elswick
Reporting on leaked information informs the public, while claims of harm are often overblown.
Journalists routinely rely on leaked information to inform the public. Without leaks, we’d be left in the dark about vital information involving the government, corporations, and powerful individuals, who often act in secret.
When government information is leaked, the U.S. routinely claims, without proof, that the leak damages national security. We should be skeptical of claims that leaks cause harm, and of broad leak investigations that can lead to the surveillance of journalists and sources and the chilling of reporting.
Trump attorneys, incoming officials lay out intentions to use the legal system to bully media and investigate leaks
Tactics used by businessman against reporting he dislikes are increasingly common. Here’s how reporters can be prepared and fight back
PRESS Act would put a stop to efforts to force journalists like Herridge to burn sources
This week, Freedom of the Press Foundation (FPF) unveiled a new website that reflects our commitment to action-based advocacy for press freedom.
Investigation of LA journalist is the latest example of authorities blaming journalists for their sources’ alleged crimes
Two Mississippi journalists may go to jail for refusing to burn their sources. Journalists in other states are at risk, too
The DOJ must end the Assange case before it turns journalists into criminals
The maximum sentence imposed on the ex-IRS contractor who leaked Trump’s tax returns to the press sends a chilling message to other would-be whistleblowers
Powerful groups aim to silence reporting on unauthorized audio despite its clear significance and immediate reverberations.
In the week since Politico dropped its blockbuster reporting on a draft Supreme Court decision that would overturn Roe v. Wade, the floodgates of leaks have opened. That’s a good thing.