Protect Source Leaks, Limit Leak Investigations

AP23104649578806 (AP Photo/Jon Elswick)

AP Photo/Jon Elswick

Reporting on leaked information informs the public, while claims of harm are often overblown.

Journalists routinely rely on leaked information to inform the public. Without leaks, we’d be left in the dark about vital information involving the government, corporations, and powerful individuals, who often act in secret.

When government information is leaked, the U.S. routinely claims, without proof, that the leak damages national security. We should be skeptical of claims that leaks cause harm, and of broad leak investigations that can lead to the surveillance of journalists and sources and the chilling of reporting.

  1. default social card (URL location fixed)

    A Review of the Justice Dept’s New Guidelines For Leak Investigations Involving the Press

    SurveillanceArticle

    In response to widespread outrage over the Justice Department’s sprawling leak investigations that engulfed reporters from the Associated Press and Fox News two months ago, Attorney General Eric Holder released long-awaited updates to its guidelines for investigations involving news media. (Ironically, they were leaked to the media before being officially …

  2. default social card (URL location fixed)

    The Snowden Principle

    WhistleblowersArticle

    At the heart of Edward Snowden's decision to expose the NSA's massive phone and Internet spying programs was a fundamental belief in the people's right-to-know. "My sole motive is to inform the public as to that which is done in their name and that which is done against them," he …