Let’s shore up funding for local news
AP Photo/David Zalubowski, file
The abysmal financial state of the news media industry poses a severe threat to the free press.
The financial collapse of the traditional news media has caused mass layoffs of journalists and the shuttering of many local news outlets. Unless these financial headwinds are reversed, journalism may disappear entirely in many communities across the United States.
We must fight back against government attempts to control or censor the news using financial pressure. Instead, governments should be focused on creating solutions to the news funding crisis that increase revenue for news outlets without subjecting them to government influence or control.
When cases that don’t involve the mainstream press don’t get the attention they should, it results in bad law that harms the rights of all journalists
Anti-press lawmakers are attacking the press by yanking contracts to publish public notices or ending requirements to publish notices in newspapers entirely
GoFundMe blocked a publisher and won’t say why. Payment processors should be transparent about decisions to freeze or ban accounts
Federal courts should continue remote audio access to trials and hearings for public and press
The NYPD is the latest force to join this anti-transparency trend
Once legislators start singling out disfavored speech for punishment there’s no telling where they’ll stop
Protect press and public access to private jet flight data
FPF, Demand Progress and more than 40 organizations urge the House to return control of the cameras to C-SPAN to serve the public
Ruling follows disturbing trend of wealthy and connected financiers attacking the press by bankrolling litigation.
In an important ruling for the press’s ability to report freely on the work of other outlets, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that including a screenshot in an article commenting on another article's reporting is not copyright infringement. This is welcome news in an age where copyright can be used to restrict what newspapers can and can’t say about each other.