Bills threaten encrypted platforms used by journalists
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1489e/1489e49429531cb635507a0178fd877454519ef2" alt="Child at computer"
Frank Duenzl/picture-alliance/dpa/AP Images
Journalists rely on strong encryption to protect confidential sources and newsgathering materials.
Journalists use encrypted services to keep information secure and private.
But lawmakers are increasingly attacking encryption. Bills that would require backdoors so law enforcement can access encrypted communications or that would discourage online services from offering strong encryption could have dire impacts on journalists and sources.
Encryption is under threat. We must defend it.
Plus: Hypocrisy as deep as the Gulf of Mexico
By demanding a back door into end-to-end encrypted iCloud data, the U.K. undermines journalist-source confidentiality
Journalists explain how encryption promotes press freedom by keeping their sources and information secure.
This week, Freedom of the Press Foundation (FPF) unveiled a new website that reflects our commitment to action-based advocacy for press freedom.
On Global Encryption Day, we urge Congress to get serious about protecting Americans’ privacy, and cut out the censorial sideshows.
Reckless charges cite everything from publishing zines to holding press conferences as components of protesters' purported conspiracy
Newsrooms must adapt to the new reality that police might ignore the law and Constitution and seize their equipment
After public backlash led to a major defeat in 2020, lawmakers are now attempting to rush the anti-privacy legislation through the Senate.
Apple announced Friday that it would postpone its planned roll-out of user device surveillance technology that had come under heavy fire from the privacy and civil liberties community. It should drop the plans entirely.
The backlash from privacy and human rights advocates to Apple's new plan this month for scanning photos on user devices to detect known child sexual abuse images has been loud and nearly unanimous. The tech raises press freedom problems, too.