Bipartisan bill would protect speech from harassing lawsuits

Ikon Images via AP
SLAPPs are lawsuits intended to chill and punish constitutionally protected speech, including journalism.
Strategic lawsuits against public participation, or SLAPPs, threaten free speech.
SLAPPs are frivolous lawsuits often brought by the wealthy and powerful against speech they dislike. SLAPPs chill reporting, activism, and criticism by forcing defendants to spend time and money defending themselves. We need strong laws that stop SLAPPs at both the state and federal level.
Potential CBS settlement would only embolden further attacks on press freedom.
Plus: Executioners find new ways to hide
Substack and Amazon Web Services’ First Amendment defense of journalist Jack Poulson should be a model for other platforms
Social platform’s unconstitutional demand for Media Matters’ donor information imperils nonprofit news, argues legal brief by FPF
In the end, the campaign to censor a journalist has brought far more attention to Maury Blackman’s domestic violence arrest
Congress has two months to pass the most important press freedom legislation in modern history.
Trump’s frivolous ‘60 Minutes’ lawsuit furthers a campaign to use consumer protection laws against free speech and press rights.
Recent news from LA and Tennessee shows latest examples of public officials’ cluelessness when it comes to journalists’ constitutional rights
With no federal anti-SLAPP law, journalists and others remain vulnerable to frivolous lawsuits that chill First Amendment rights
Here’s what journalists should watch for in the first case applying the state’s new law meant to protect against meritless anti-speech lawsuits