Bipartisan bill would protect speech from harassing lawsuits


Ikon Images via AP
SLAPPs are lawsuits intended to chill and punish constitutionally protected speech, including journalism.
Strategic lawsuits against public participation, or SLAPPs, threaten free speech.
SLAPPs are frivolous lawsuits often brought by the wealthy and powerful against speech they dislike. SLAPPs chill reporting, activism, and criticism by forcing defendants to spend time and money defending themselves. We need strong laws that stop SLAPPs at both the state and federal level.

With no federal anti-SLAPP law, journalists and others remain vulnerable to frivolous lawsuits that chill First Amendment rights

Here’s what journalists should watch for in the first case applying the state’s new law meant to protect against meritless anti-speech lawsuits

The Texas attorney general is “investigating” Media Matters for its reporting. Traditional journalists and news outlets could be next

New bill would undermine anonymous sourcing and invite libel tourism

NewsGuild should be working to expand the reporter’s privilege, not demanding journalists out sources in court

Recent case marks latest setback for politicians who want to bankrupt their critics with litigation

A patchwork of state laws and the lack of a federal anti-SLAPP law leave free expression vulnerable to chilling lawsuits

Proposal would ‘Europeanize’ American law and protect elites

Proposal threatens to stifle investigative reporting

Press protections must be codified after proposals to weaponize courts against journalists