Prosecuting WikiLeaks for publishing activities poses a profound threat to press freedom

FPF Icon Color

Promoting press freedom in the 21st century

Uwe Steinert

On Thursday night Justice Department prosecutors inadvertently published court documents that strongly suggest that the Trump administration has secretly filed charges against WikiLeaks publisher Julian Assange. Shortly afterwards, the Washington Post confirmed that charges have indeed been filed against Assange.

While it’s so far unclear what the charges are, news organizations have speculated they may involve the Espionage Act, the 100 year old law that—on its face—threatens the ability of journalists to do their jobs and could criminalize national security reporting. The Espionage Act has, up until this point, never been used to prosecute a journalist or publisher.

Trevor Timm, executive director of Freedom of the Press Foundation, has issued the following statement:

Get Notified. Take Action.

“Any charges brought against WikiLeaks for their publishing activities pose a profound and incredibly dangerous threat to press freedom. Whether you like Assange or hate him, the theories used in a potential Espionage Act prosecution would threaten countless reporters at the New York Times, Washington Post, and the many other news outlets that report on government secrets all the time. While everyone will have to wait and see what the charges detail, it’s quite possible core First Amendment principles will be at stake in this case.”

We will have much more analysis and comment as this case develops.


Donate to support press freedom

Your support is more important than ever.

Read more about Leaks

The government says it won’t prosecute ‘real’ journalists. Don’t believe it

Recent statements about a military newspaper belie claims that the government won’t treat conventional journalists like it treated Julian Assange

Assange decision should be wake-up call for US

America was once recognized as a leader in press rights. Now other countries question its commitment to the First Amendment

‘Classified information’ isn’t a magic formula to suspend the First Amendment

The Supreme Court seems to understand the First Amendment limits on government coercion of speech — except when it comes to national security