Not publishing newsworthy leaks isn’t journalistic integrity, it’s timidity

AP Photo/Jon Elswick
Reporting on leaked information informs the public, while claims of harm are often overblown.
Journalists routinely rely on leaked information to inform the public. Without leaks, we’d be left in the dark about vital information involving the government, corporations, and powerful individuals, who often act in secret.
When government information is leaked, the U.S. routinely claims, without proof, that the leak damages national security. We should be skeptical of claims that leaks cause harm, and of broad leak investigations that can lead to the surveillance of journalists and sources and the chilling of reporting.
Any Espionage Act prosecution also threatens journalists at the New York Times and Washington Post.
FBI whistleblower Terry Albury has been sentenced to four years in prison for leaking information of huge public interest value to the press.
Freedom of the Press Foundation statement on the Justice Department's arrest and charges against Treasury Department employee Natalie Mayflower Sours Edwards for allegedly sharing information with the press
The first whistleblower prosecuted by the Trump administration, Reality Winner pled guilty to one count of violating the Espionage Act. Her case is the latest in a long history of targeting sources and whistleblowers under the draconian law.
Former intelligence contractor and whistleblower Reality Winner has pled guilty to leaking a secret NSA report to the press.
The surveillance of reporters for doing their job is an affront to press freedom.
Leak investigations are up 800% and we have no idea how the Trump administration is targeting journalists.
An attack on leakers and whistleblowers is an attack on journalism itself.
Prosecuting sources is a direct threat to press freedom.
The Espionage Act is a draconian statute used to stifle press freedom for decades.