Not publishing newsworthy leaks isn’t journalistic integrity, it’s timidity

AP Photo/Jon Elswick
Reporting on leaked information informs the public, while claims of harm are often overblown.
Journalists routinely rely on leaked information to inform the public. Without leaks, we’d be left in the dark about vital information involving the government, corporations, and powerful individuals, who often act in secret.
When government information is leaked, the U.S. routinely claims, without proof, that the leak damages national security. We should be skeptical of claims that leaks cause harm, and of broad leak investigations that can lead to the surveillance of journalists and sources and the chilling of reporting.
The first whistleblower prosecuted by the Trump administration, Reality Winner pled guilty to one count of violating the Espionage Act. Her case is the latest in a long history of targeting sources and whistleblowers under the draconian law.
Former intelligence contractor and whistleblower Reality Winner has pled guilty to leaking a secret NSA report to the press.
The surveillance of reporters for doing their job is an affront to press freedom.
Leak investigations are up 800% and we have no idea how the Trump administration is targeting journalists.
An attack on leakers and whistleblowers is an attack on journalism itself.
Prosecuting sources is a direct threat to press freedom.
The Espionage Act is a draconian statute used to stifle press freedom for decades.
The Espionage Act is used to prosecute whistleblowers and threaten journalists. This is its history.
The Trump administration charged a news outlet's source under the draconian Espionage Act this week. Edward Snowden responds.
Trump allegedly urged Comey to imprison journalists who publish classified information. This is a grave threat to press freedom.