Protect Journalism Online

TikTok influencer in Montana after the ban was issued - AP23187638051023

AP Photo/Tommy Martino

Efforts to undermine First Amendment rights on the internet and to censor online content are a fundamental threat to the free press.

When lawmakers try to censor online speech or entire platforms, it harms the First Amendment rights on which journalists rely.

Most people get their news online, and the internet and social media are especially important for independent and citizen journalists who publish there. Anyone who cares about press freedom should also oppose attempts to undermine free speech online.

Tell lawmakers to REJECT congressional secrecy

Help us tell Congress that online censorship legislation won’t stop real safety threats — the only thing it will protect politicians from is investigative journalists.

First Name * Last Name
Email Address *
Street Address * Zip Code *

Edit this message so that it is unique to you: Dear Member of Congress, I am writing to ask that your office REJECT and speak out against S.2144. I believe this legislation would not make lawmakers more secure and would lead to the censorship of constitutionally protected speech. S.2144 would allow members of Congress — and, in an expansion of past versions, even former members — to compel the censorship of a broad range of information that journalists and others are constitutionally entitled to publish. It will facilitate corruption by hindering reporting on congressional affairs, while providing a mirage of security to lawmakers and their loved ones. It is in direct conflict with the values that your office seeks to uphold: transparency, accountability, free expression, and freedom of the press. It would impede efforts by journalists and watchdogs, for example, to check property, vehicle, or travel records to investigate bribery allegations, monitor lawmakers leaving their districts during emergencies, scrutinize potential financial conflicts impacting policy positions, and a myriad of other newsworthy matters. PLEASE REJECT this unconstitutional amendment and urge your colleagues to focus on efforts to keep lawmakers (and everyone else) safe without undermining transparency and accountability, which are themselves vital for public safety.

* Required. We will not share your information with third parties. Learn more

Something went wrong processing this request. Please try again later.

Opt in to email updates from Freedom of the Press Foundation

Something went wrong and your email updates subscription could not be processed. Please visit our signup page and try again.

Thank you for helping us tell Congress not to grant itself broad power to censor the internet. It’s trying to do this quietly and needs to know that people are paying attention.

Donate

Share this message on social media:
Join me in telling Congress that the public is unwilling to trade government transparency for a false sense of security for politicians. https://freedom.press/issues/protect-journalism-online/

Featured Items

PayPal and Venmo enforcement procedures threaten First Amendment protected speech
Online Censorship•Article
PayPal and its subsidiary Venmo must bring more transparency and accountability to its practices around account freezes and closures, argues a new letter signed by Freedom of the Press Foundation and nearly two dozen human rights and civil liberties groups.

June 15, 2021 Parker Higgins
When algorithms come for journalists
Online Censorship•Article
Journalists — especially those without institutional newsroom support — rely on tools from major tech companies like Google and YouTube for newsgathering, production and distribution as a matter of course. As these information giants publicly wrestle with controversial content moderation decisions that dominate headlines and Congressional hearings, their decisions also run the risk of stifling routine reporting.

Feb. 19, 2021 Parker Higgins
Music industry forces widely used journalist tool offline
Online Censorship•Article
The popular free software project “youtube-dl” was removed from Github on Friday following a legal notice from the Recording Industry Association of America claiming it violates copyright law. The tool is widely used by journalists for various reporting purposes.

Oct. 26, 2020 Parker Higgins
Onions on the side: Tracking Tor availability for reader privacy on major news sites
Encryption•Article
“Onion services,” a technology offered by Tor to ensure users can securely and privately visit particular websites, can provide a major step forward for readers who rely on the Tor network for its privacy and censorship-resistance properties.

Oct. 6, 2020 Dr. Jennifer Helsby Parker Higgins
Trump, in crisis mode, tweets his 2000th attack on the press
Trump•Article
As the COVID-19 pandemic continues to upend daily life, President Donald Trump accelerated smearing the press on Twitter, reaching 2,000 negative tweets about the media in a string of insults and accusations on April 11, 2020.According to our analysis of more than 19,400 of Trump’s tweets, 2,000 means that …

April 13, 2020 Stephanie Sugars Kirstin McCudden
Back on the campaign trail, President Trump increases his anti-press tweet offensive
Trump•Article
From Jan. 20, 2019 to Jan. 19, 2020, Trump tweeted negatively about the media 548 times — almost as many as his first two years in office combined.

Jan. 20, 2020 Stephanie Sugars
Google should protect whistleblowers and increase transparency, not stifle it
Whistleblowers•Article
Google should protect whistleblowers who to the press, and immediately address the concerns that its employees have raised about the company’s complicity in a project that could expand China’s censorship and damage press freedom.

Sept. 10, 2018 Camille Fassett
Facebook’s terms of service obstruct important journalistic research
Online Censorship•Article
By prohibiting automated collection of information, Facebook's terms of service are obstructing important digital and investigative journalism. In a letter, the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University asks Facebook to modify its terms of service.

Aug. 7, 2018 Camille Fassett
A new law is already stifling online expression and hurting sex workers
Online Censorship•Article
President Trump signed SESTA/FOSTA into law today. While it has been touted by lawmakers as a tool to crack down on sex trafficking, it will drastically expand online censorship and endanger the people it intends to protect.

April 11, 2018 Camille Fassett
Archiving the alternative press threatened by wealthy buyers
Media Funding•Article
Freedom of the Press Foundation is launching an online archives collection in partnership with Archive-It, a service developed by the Internet Archive to help organizations preserve online content. Our collection, focusing on news outlets we deem to be especially vulnerable to "billionaire problem," aims to preserve sites in their entirety before their archives can be taken down or manipulated.

Jan. 31, 2018 Parker Higgins